Lulu
All projects

Case study

Canada Online Tutoring

UX Design · Website

A website redesign for a Canadian tutoring service, so families can tell the programs apart and see how to start. View current site

UX Designer · 2026 · Website redesign · Web

Tools·Figma

Canada Online Tutoring preview
Overview

Overview

Canada Online Tutoring supports learners from early childhood through university, plus career skills and English. The current site introduces those offers as sections on one page. The redesign turns them into six programs, each with its own page, a shared way to browse subjects, and the same path from “this is who it’s for” to booking a consultation.

Problem

People had to book before the site would answer a basic question.

The consultation was a gate. Pricing, weekly hours, and tutor availability were not on the page. Robin Cheng said “Book a free consultation” felt like a personal-injury site, and that he might leave.

Subject cards didn’t go anywhere. Allison’s mom tried to open Mathematics, hit a dead end, and rated finding a math tutor 4–5 out of 5 in difficulty. The hero buttons also disappeared into the photo.

Programs and Subjects overlapped. Rita expected parents to start with a subject. The age-based program pages had little on them, and it was unclear when to use Programs, Subjects, or Events.

Goals

Goals

Make the programs easy to tell apart, put price and tutor details on the page before a booking, and give every subject a next step.

Research

Research

I interviewed three people on the live site — Robin Cheng, Allison’s mom, and Rita — and affinity-mapped the sessions. Five themes kept returning: the consultation gate, dead-end navigation, a confusing menu, trust, and how families actually search.

Interviews

Three sessions. Each person tried to find a tutor, a subject, and a price before deciding whether to book.

Affinity mapping

Quotes grouped into five themes, from the booking gate to school referrals, word of mouth, and local search.

Task walkthroughs

Finding a math tutor, opening a subject card, and reaching a filter or a booking. The Mathematics card was the clearest break.

3

interviews on the live site

5

themes from affinity mapping

2

personas guiding the redesign

  • “Before clicking on book free consultation, I want to look at the website for more info on courses and offerings and not have to book a consultation immediately.”
  • “I tried to click on the Mathematics box but it didn’t lead anywhere.”
  • “Programs and Subjects feel redundant. The age-range program pages had little information.”

The Independent Evaluator

26–28 · Self-serve researcher

“Missing basics before a consultation: cost, how many hours a week, and tutor availability.”

  • Inspect course codes, curriculum fit, prices, and availability before sharing contact details
  • Compare credentials, languages, and real tutor profiles
  • A consultation is required before the site shows a price, hours, or who is available
  • Hidden filters, overlapping Programs and Subjects pages, and reviews that all look like five stars

The Direct Task-Oriented Parent

60 · Parent looking for a tutor now

“I tried to click on the Mathematics box but it didn’t lead anywhere.”

  • Find a subject tutor quickly and check that they are qualified
  • Filter by subject, gender, and schedule, then book
  • Subject cards and calls to action that don’t lead anywhere
  • Pricing that stays hidden, and too many steps before a booking
Redesign

Areas to redesign

Four areas came out of the interviews. The program pages take on the sparse, overlapping program content. Pricing, working subject cards, and tutor filters are the rest of what those sessions asked for.

Pricing on the page

Show a starting rate or range on Early Childhood, K–8, high school, university, and career pages, with an email list or a short inquiry beside the consultation.

Cards that open

Subject and course cards need a destination. Label the course-code and grade filter so it is obvious that it opens the directory.

A clearer menu

Programs, Subjects, and Events were easy to confuse. Age-based programs need enough on the page to stand apart from the subject list.

Tutors people can check

Filter by subject, gender, schedule, and credentials. Keep real photos and degrees, and replace a wall of five-star reviews with proof from a source people already trust.

Architecture

Architecture

The age-based program pages had little on them, while parents started with subjects. The menu is the map: each program opens a page with the same sequence, written for that learner.

Programs → Early Childhood, K–8, Secondary & High School, College & University, Career & Life Skills, English Tutoring
Program page → Hero, approach, subject grid, how tutoring works
Start → Free consultation, then lessons and progress
Design

Before and after

The current high school page, before the redesign. Each new program page uses the same structure — audience, subjects, process, community, and a booking close — with navy and red carrying the brand.

Current Canada Online Tutoring high school page, before the redesign
Current high school page

Homepage explorations

Homepage exploration with an illustrated hero of shapes, a question mark, and a matched badge
Illustrated hero
Homepage exploration with a photo of a tutor and student inside the navy hero
Photo hero
Homepage exploration with a navy headline beside a full-height photo
Split hero
Homepage exploration with the illustrated hero, program cards, how tutoring works, and reviews
Full homepage

Program pages

Programs menu listing Early Childhood through English Tutoring
Programs menu
K–8 program page — foundations in writing, French, math, and reading
K–8
Secondary and high school program page — results-driven tutoring for grades and exams
Secondary & high school
College and university program page — support for advanced courses
College & university
Career and life skills program page — in-demand skills beyond the classroom
Career & life skills
English tutoring program page — ESL and academic English pathways
English tutoring
Conclusion

Reflection

The useful constraint was repetition. Once every program shared a page, the differences could live in the audience, the subjects, and the words — not in a new layout each time.

Next

Path Learning